Henry BoE Budgetary Prowess
This post is in regard to the changes announced for BoE bussing of kids to be effective in August.
The Henry Board of Education has never had to deal with real budget restrictions. The voters, until this year, have always approved any bond referendum or other plea to grant them more money. It has also been the position of the BoE that "for the children" and political correctness and strengthening the community were primary concerns. In fact this board has reached the state's legal 20 mil limit on property taxes and maintains efforts to increase that limit through our legislative delegation. It is clear to many that they cannot operate within a budget, whether reduced by state allocations or reductions in SPLOST or property taxes, as other school districts are forced into.
Our board members took it personally when the voters refused to increase property taxes for the bond issue. They are panicked because they are ill prepared to face the same economic realities of the people whose money they feel entitled to.
No, we did not need new schools. It is doubtful that we need new school buses. The extra $256 million bond was opposed by school system employees as well as others. Nobody was fooled by the emotional appeals and otherwise lack of explanation of real need.
Note that throughout the whining episodes cast upon us the board has not, as examples, offered to cut
· administrative salaries or positions
· Unnecessary positions like coaches and counselors that run interference between teachers and students and parents;
· Unnecessary programs designed to indoctrinate rather than educate;
· Resource Officers from the Henry Sheriff's Office since they are window dressing and fill a political rather than police function;
The bureaucracy must be protected and the rules must be devised to maintain order and control. A quotation attributed to Mark Twain seems appropriate, "God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board."
Whether anyone believes the one-mile or one-third mile restrictions will make much difference, no actual numbers of affected students has been published. Again, a policy was enacted to punish citizens for refusing to support and defend the BoE appetite for unrestricted tax dollars.
Remember this: Sixty Percent (60%) of our property tax dollars are allocated to the school board. They also receive another three and one-half mils (3.5) through back-door bond debt we already approved.
Some of us have lost jobs, some our homes. Money is not free flowing at our houses. We must make adjustments, persevere and overcome. Sometimes we must give up things we want in favor of what we need. So must our school board.
Larry Stanley



Comments
Submitted to The Citizen Newsletter:
This decision was slipped through in June for a reason. I don't think it was specifically on the agenda for that day's meeting; just the general heading of 'Transportation.'
Comments were made to school officials that there would be a huge outcry over this because of the timing of it, and they acted like they didn't believe it. I wonder what their plan was. Were they going to send all of the affected parents a letter a week or so before school starts? Honestly, I thought Surma was smarter than that.
You know I don't overreact about issues like this, but I think this dwarfs the fireworks debacle with the BOC. This thing could EXPLODE.
Of course, my philosophical position is that my tax dollars shouldn't be obligated to carry other people's kids to school. But the way this was handled is incredibly poor; it's the kind of issue that can change the face of the school board in 2010.
Just my two cents.
Posted by: Larry Stanley | June 27, 2009 12:40 PM
I don't know who submitted this to the site but..... TWO CENTS !!!!
I'm paying almost 1600 bucks a year and I'm 65 .... plus I don't and never have or ever will use the Henry County School system.....
How can I get by with paying just two cents?
Maybe I'll learn a thing or two at the F.A.T. rally on July 4th at the Henry County Administration building starting at 6 pm.... we will be finished in time for those who attend to get to one of the FREE fireworks shows in and around the southside....
Don
Posted by: Don Henderson | June 27, 2009 06:05 PM
While I do agree with you on your standpoint of this issue, the Resource Officer at my high school did indeed prove to be a useful tool on multiple occasions. There were many fights and other altercations that he was able to help put an end to. But then again, he was a very kind young man who actually felt passionately about his job. I do believe though that the other possible budget cuts would be both totally appropriate and necessary.
Posted by: Jacqueline | June 28, 2009 03:55 AM
I fully agree that a resource officer is a necessity at the school today as the ACLU and others have taken the ability to discipline any student misbehavior away from those in charge.... given that atmosphere and the knowledge that mommy and daddy are going to say "my child would never do that" a legal arm of the law is about the only thing that enables order to exist..... Teachers need that ability but as a society we want to put them in a lions den without a chair or whip....
There are many more areas that could be cut... not discipline... God knows we need more of that not less.
Posted by: Don Henderson | June 28, 2009 06:31 PM