Why won't this guy go away?
Tax Hike Mike is back in the news:
Mike Huckabee is using his new book, out this week, to settle a few scores, not the least of which is with his fierce primary rival, Mitt Romney.Reading through other comments he supposedly makes in the book, he just sounds like a bitter guy trying to get back at all the people who called him out for what he really is: a tax hiking, religious, progressive who has a freightening amount of ignorance when it comes to what capitalism is and has no idea as to what liberty really means.Per Michael Scherer, Huckabee picks up where he left off earlier this year, tweaking Romney as a rich guy and firing what may be the first shots of the 2012 primary.
Romney, Huckabee, writes, was "anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.”
At another point, Huckabee portrays a Romney proposal to encourage more investment in the market as, "Let them eat stocks!”
The former Arkansas governor also takes a shot at Fred Thompson – who ensured his defeat in the pivotal South Carolina primary – as well as those evangelical leaders who didn’t get behind his bid.
But none of these people may emerge again in four years as political rivals of Huckabee.

You can see the growing influence of faux-cons in the 2008 election cycle from the so-called Ron Paul Revolution to the economics-only conservatism reflected by some of the supporters of Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani.John Tabin over at The American Spectator points out that THM's version of conservatism doesn't exactly jive with Ronald Reagan:
If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism... The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.I'll echo what Doug Mataconis says, bring it on Huck. We're ready for you in 2012. We'll go ahead and start it right here and right now...call it the HUCK? NO! movement.Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say... But again, I stand on my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same path.
Comments
Why won't this guy go away?
Apparently, God doesn't do the smite thing anymore.
Posted by: Daniel N. Adams | November 17, 2008 07:43 PM
Huckabee:
I don't take issue with what they ["feux-cons"] believe, but the smugness with which they believe it.
Faux-Cons aren't interested in spirited or thoughtful debate, because such an endeavor requires accountability for the logical conclusion of their argument.
Posted by: Robbie | November 17, 2008 08:52 PM
Every time Huckabee was challenged on his record, he ran from it or lied about it. If anyone is scared of debate, it is Mike Huckabee.
I would also add that his comment is a lie, because he does very much take issue with it. He has said so in the past.
Posted by: Jason | November 17, 2008 08:55 PM
I'm very fearful that the same folks that ran in this election are going to run again with the same tired message. All Huckabee did in this election was mess with the conservative vote that should have gone to Romney or Thompson. He raised taxes more than Bill Clinton as governor of Arkansas. He's a pretty funny guy, but that's about all he's got.
Posted by: Daniel | November 17, 2008 10:41 PM
I'd be careful telling God he doesn't to the smite thing anymore. Just take a look at our nation.
Posted by: Artie Gray | November 17, 2008 11:05 PM
Guess its a good time to plug this...
Make sure to buy your F*** the H*** clothing here.
Posted by: Marty Dodge | November 18, 2008 10:39 AM
Mike Huckabee: a Bible-thumping Bill Clinton.
Posted by: The Remnant | November 18, 2008 11:16 AM
FK HUCK!
Posted by: Mike in Elberton | November 18, 2008 02:32 PM
Huck?No!
I want a shirt, a bumper sticker, and a hat.
Posted by: Ryan Larosa | November 19, 2008 12:58 AM
Why don't you ignorant people read the book before you criticize what's in it? Two pages out of 240 pages mention other people, the rest is devoted to the future of the Republican Party.
Posted by: VFT | November 19, 2008 01:56 AM
I like Huck...he opposed the bailout...and wasn't afraid to say it even when Bush and the GOP leadership were backing it.
That is more than can be said about McCain or Romney who thought the failed bailout was dandy. I wonder who is really economically conservative?
Posted by: David Schmidt | November 19, 2008 04:06 AM
That is more than can be said about McCain or Romney who thought the failed bailout was dandy. I wonder who is really economically conservative?
Surely, you aren't suggesting that the Hucktard is somehow an economic conservative because he opposed the bailout. Dennis Kucinich opposed the bailout out too.
I don't really care about McCain. I've been critical of Romney for his healthcare abortion in Massachusetts.
But Huckabee has no real grasp on economics. He opposes free trade, supports higher taxes and is a big spender. He has a record to back it up.
Why don't you ignorant people read the book before you criticize what's in it?
The main reason is because I'm not wasting my hard earned money on trash.
Posted by: Jason | November 19, 2008 06:30 AM
"The main reason is because I'm not wasting my hard earned money on trash."
Or putting it in Huck's pocket.
Posted by: rightwingprof | November 19, 2008 10:29 AM
"Reading through other comments he supposedly makes in the book, he just sounds like a bitter guy..."
Why don't you and others stop drinking the kool-aid that others poor for you and actually read the book for yourself? Anyone can take small comments from an entire book and make them sound totally different. It is called context. You might try using some.
Posted by: Joseph | November 23, 2008 05:06 PM
"But Huckabee has no real grasp on economics. He opposes free trade, supports higher taxes and is a big spender."
That is a lie. Read the book and his actual record, not the Club for Growth's propaganda. If you do not want to contribute to Mike, that is fine, go to the library or Barnes and Noble to read it.
You might also check into the contributors of Club for Growth so you know the whole picture as several are also Romney supporters as well as Arkansas people with an axe to grind.
Posted by: Joseph | November 23, 2008 05:12 PM
The Club for Growth didn't support any particular candidate in the GOP primary. They're published white papers that were equally critical of all perspective nominees, including Mitt Romney.
That is a lie. Read the book and his actual record, not the Club for Growth's propaganda.
He did support increased taxes as Governor of Arkansas. That has been independently verified and Arkansas taxpayers saw a net tax increase of more than $500 million during his tenure.
He was constantly talking about "fair trade" instead of free trade. He based his support of farm subsides on national security.
The man is no fiscal conservative and anyone who says otherwise is a damn liar, including yourself.
If anyone is drinking the Kool-Aid, it's you.
Posted by: Jason | November 23, 2008 05:42 PM
I'm not sure why CFG is against Huckabee so much. He cut taxes 94 times as governor of Arkansas and left the state with a $850 million surplus. Also, he is one of the few Republicans to take a stand against the federal bailout. Plus, you can't be a social conservative without also being a fiscal conservative. A breakdown of the social issues is directly related to the size and cost of government. CFG are liars.
Posted by: Iowans Rock | November 23, 2008 11:56 PM
He did cut taxes 93 times, but he also increased taxes 21 times, leaving taxpayers with a net tax increase of over $500 million. Why is that so hard to understand?
You people have to do better than this.
Posted by: Jason | November 24, 2008 06:13 AM
Jason, If you don't like someone just say it, anyone who reads this can clearly see this is more about you not liking Huckabee. You quick to re-comment as soon as someone posts a positive comment about him.
Tax Hike Mike??? Dude, Come on man.
Posted by: truth4u | November 24, 2008 10:01 AM
What is your point? Of course I don't like him, I don't hate the man, but I think he represents what is wrong with the GOP.
But why don't I like him? The man plays off the ignorance of people like yourself and constantly lies about his record and he gets a pass. Why? Because he is a funny guy? Because is religious?
You're going to have to do better than that.
Posted by: Jason | November 24, 2008 10:20 AM
Thanks, My point was just made!
Posted by: truth4u | November 24, 2008 10:25 AM
You don't really have a point. I don't like the guy, but it's cool. Tax Hike Mike apparently doesn't like a lot of people too. Should we discount everything he says now?
Posted by: Jason | November 24, 2008 10:35 AM
Jason, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you, we on the same team, just want you to give his supporters the benefit of the doubt, they know his record because the Club made sure of it, his supporters or not dumb and they know who they want and what he stands for. You know a lot did not like Reagan at first ether , I'm glad no one listen to them, aren't you? Peace out V!
Posted by: Truth4u | November 24, 2008 10:55 AM
Uhhh, yeah you are.
They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt because if they had looked at his record, they could not possibly make the claim that Tax Hike Mike is a fiscal conservative.
Posted by: Jason | November 24, 2008 12:02 PM
"Why won't this guy go away?"
Because Gov. Huckabee is our voice and "we the people" won't let him go away. It must be pretty scary for you in the Libertarian part of the party to see Huckabee getting his message to even more of us Main Street/Sam's Club, Reagan/Huckabee Republicans - many of which still cling to religion and guns.
Posted by: Granny T | November 24, 2008 02:59 PM
"He did cut taxes 93 times, but he also increased taxes 21 times, leaving taxpayers with a net tax increase of over $500 million. Why is that so hard to understand?"
How do you explain the Tax Freedom Day staying virtually the same in Arkansas after Huckabee serving 10 1/2 years in office? Especially since they figure the Tax Freedom Day to include ALL taxes - federal, state, and local.
Hucakbee took office in July of 1996 and left office in January 1997. Check it out for yourself.
[url]http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22328.html[/url]
And while you're there be sure and see how the Tax Freedom Day didn't come until about 6 days later under the Romney administration is spite of the fact that he only served 4 years and things in the state didn't improve very much for the extra money.
Posted by: Granny T | November 24, 2008 03:14 PM
Why do supporters of the Huckster believe anyone who disagrees with him is a support of Mitt Romney? I didn’t support Romney. I supported Ron Paul, even then only half-heartedly because Dr. Paul was a terrible campaigner.
Using Tax Freedom Day as a guide to the tax burden is misguided. The Tax Foundation has much better statistics to use. Such as the actual statistics dealing with the tax burden that show that Arkansas jumped 13th in the nation in tax burden on its citizens. It was ranked 30th in the nation when Tax Hike Mike came into office.
As far as tax burden goes, the Huckster looks terrible when compared to Bill Clinton. See the data for yourself, which by the way, excludes federal taxes.
How do you explain the Tax Freedom Day staying virtually the same in Arkansas after Huckabee serving 10 1/2 years in office? Especially since they figure the Tax Freedom Day to include ALL taxes - federal, state, and local.
Isn't the fiscal conservative view to see that date come earlier in the year?
Looking at the dates actually confirms a lot of what I've been saying. In 2000, Tax Freedom Day came on April 25th, the latest date for the state on record. It comes down a couple years later and goes back up.
You're actually digging yourself a hole there instead of making an argument for the Hucktard.
Posted by: Jason | November 24, 2008 04:15 PM