Fred Thompson: Analysis
Politico is reporting that former U.S. Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) is planning to announce his bid for President of the United States on or around the 4th of July. Thompson has been touted by many Republicans as the last best hope for the GOP. Some are not convinced that Thompson is not any different from the current crop of big-government conservatives that currently run the GOP and currently hold the top three positions in the GOP Presidential polls. Since there is really no consensus on who Fred Thompson is, or what his impact might be, I have conducted an analysis of his political positions and votes as they pertain to all three parties. (Some of these may overlap)
What Republicans will like about Thompson:
--Would like to impose a two-year limit on welfare benifits for recipients who are able to work
--Would like to slightly increase spending on national defense, law enforcement, and drug interdiction
--Supports decreasing the Captial Gains Tax, Cigarette Taxes, Income Taxes, taxes on domestic and international businesses, and would also support eliminating taxes on savings and investment
--Terrible ratings with the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Brady Campaign
--Would increase penalties on the selling and trafficking of illegal drugs
--Believes congress should eliminate federal funding to facilities that provide abortions
What Republicans will hate about Thompson:
--Voted for McCain-Feingold
--Believes that a woman should be able to seek an abortion under any circumstances as long as it is in the first trimester
--Is not "Christian enough" for James Dobson and the religious right
What Democrats will like about Thompson:
--Believes that a woman should be able to seek and abortion under any circumstances as long as it is in the first trimester
--Is not "Christian enough" for James Dobson and the religious right
What Democrats will hate about Thompson:
--Supports decreasing the Captial Gains Tax, Cigarette Taxes, Income Taxes, taxes on domestic and international businesses, and would also support eliminating taxes on savings and investment
--Terrible ratings with the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the Brady Campaign
--Supports eliminating government regulation to encourage investement and economic expansion in the private sector
--Wants to allow the natural cycle of the market to create jobs without government intervention
--Supports school choice programs so that parents receive vouchers that can be used to send their children to participating schools.
--Believes congress should eliminate federal funding to facilities that provide abortions
--Wants to decrease spending in federal health care programs and research
What Libertarians will like about Thompson:
--Supports decreasing the Captial Gains Tax, Cigarette Taxes, Income Taxes, taxes on domestic and international businesses, and would also support eliminating taxes on savings and investment
--Terrible ratings with the Brady Campaign
--Supports eliminating government regulation to encourage investement and economic expansion in the private sector
--Wants to allow the natural cycle of the market to create jobs without government intervention
--Supports school choice programs so that parents receive vouchers that can be used to send their children to participating schools.
--Believes congress should eliminate federal funding to facilities that provide abortions
--Wants to decrease spending in federal health care programs and research
--Would like to limit the growth of government to 2%
--Is not "Christian enough" for James Dobson and the religious right
What Libertarians will hate about Thompson:
--Would increase penalties on the selling and trafficking of illegal drugs
--Voted for McCain-Feingold
--Would like to slightly increase spending on national defense, law enforcement, and drug interdiction
Overall, I think Fred Thompson could easily win the GOP nomination. The fact that he's not the poster boy for the religious right and the fact that he tends to favor free-market reforms as opposed to government "solutions" could attract many Libertarians and independents who lean libertarian. Then again, the fact he supports market-based solutions as opposed to big-government might scare off some Republicans. Unless the Democrats field someone other than Clinton, Obama, or Edwards, I don't see Thompson pulling a lot of votes from the Dems.
As of now, Fred is my second choice. Besides Ron Paul and possibly Jim Gilmore, he is the ONLY Republican I can support. If any other GOP candidate gets the nomination, I'll either vote Libertarian (if they actually nominate someone besides Doug Stanhope) or I'll leave it blank.



Comments
Looks like the "Likes" outnumber the "Dislikes."
I agree that Thompson can take the Republican nomination. Not for being "Republican" but for being a conservative.
the fact he supports market-based solutions as opposed to big-government might scare off some Republicans.
Republicans in Congress have already shown they are scared of their own shadows. Face-to-face voters who typically vote Repulican are mostly Conservatives -- they will not be scared.
Posted by: Larry Stanley | May 30, 2007 01:26 PM
Looks like the "Likes" outnumber the "Dislikes."
Not exactly the best way to choose a candidate, but I'll go with that.
Larry, if face-to-face voters who typically vote Republican are mostly Conservative, then why do they keep electing liberal Republicans to office?
I agree with Jace, Fred Thompson isn't the best man in the race. But the best man in the race has no chance of winning. Fred is 2nd or 3rd on my list.
Posted by: Northside Elephant | May 30, 2007 01:34 PM
Great job on the summary. I'm still holding on my refusal to vote for the "lesser of two evils" candidate this time around, and am looking for a net positive choice. Right now it's Ron Paul.
It won't take much for Thompson to get to being a [small] positive, when my pick is narrowed to Fred & the three amigos. (Couldn't bring myself to type stooges there.) Maybe if he'd come out and say that his vote on McCain-Feingold was a mistake?
Posted by: Joy | May 30, 2007 02:37 PM
why do they keep electing liberal Republicans to office?
Hope, gullible, delusional? I cannot say. But the last few years, not topped off with W acting like Pelosi's twin, is like a straw breaking the camel's back!
The November '06 elections proved a lot about voter dissatisfaction.
The odds that the Republicans can win the '08 general election with a Rudy or McCain are Slim & None. Slim left town last November.
Posted by: Larry Stanley | May 30, 2007 02:59 PM