« Carter gets owned... | Main | Rep. Loren Collins on the web »

Secrecy bill could make a come back

A controversial bill from 2005 could make it's way back through the state legislature. House Bill 218 would have allowed government to keep negotiations with private industry secret. It made it's way through the State House in 2005, but was stalled in the Senate:

Supporters say the measure is needed to help the state recruit employers. Georgia is at a disadvantage, they say, because the current law's requirement that government documents be available to the public means officials from neighboring states can request a copy of the incentives Georgia is offering a company, then up the ante.

Some executives with companies considering a Georgia plant are also nervous about the possibility of publicity, said Rep. Burke Day, R-Tybee Island.

"It's just too risky to attract a company if they're concerned that it's going to be exposed to the world before they can get back to talk to their hometown employees or even the stockholders," Day said.

Opponents argue that there is little evidence that the state's open-records laws have caused Georgia to lose a single development prospect.

Attorney General Thurbert Baker, a Democrat, made it clear during the campaign that he opposed the measure and feared it could lead to even more exemptions from open-records laws.

"If you start on that slippery slope, it's hard to get off of it," said Baker, who has frequently been applauded by open-records advocates for his efforts on the issue.

Hopefully, our delegations wants the citizens to be aware of what's going on in a developing county like Henry. I'm hoping that if this legislation is brought to the floor again that they will vote against it, unlike the last time.

Hat tip to Peach Pundit.

Comments

I am completely undecided on this bill at the moment. Here are the two reasons: First, I believe in open government. That is the basis of our system of government. On the flip side, only West VA and GA allow business negotiations to be viewed in public. Our neighbors regularly come here, file Freedom of Information requests to see negotiations with potential businesses and then go home and make better offers. North Carolina, Florida and Alabama are particularly bad about this tactic.

The question I have to answer is which takes precedent, open government or losing jobs to other states? I would appreciate your thoughts.

In addition to the Eminent Domain issue in Stockbridge, I was involved with a dispute with GDOT over information regarding commuter rail. They refused to release information to me as a sitting legislator on the Transportation Committee, and I had to file a grievance with the Attorney General and force them to release the information! If departments are willing to fight legislators over information when there is a difference of opinion, we can only imagine how they fight the general public.

Believe it or not this bill came through the House with little fan fare. It was touted as a pro-business neces