More on the libertarian vote
David Boaz and David Kirby have continued their research on the influence of the libertarian vote in national elections:
This year we commissioned a nationwide post-election survey of 1013 voters from Zogby International. We again found that 15 percent of the voters held libertarian views. We also found a further swing of libertarians away from Republican candidates. In 2006, libertarians voted 59-36 for Republican congressional candidates—a 24-point swing from the 2002 mid-term election. To put this in perspective, front-page stories since the election have reported the dramatic 7-point shift of white conservative evangelicals away from the Republicans. The libertarian vote is about the same size as the religious right vote measured in exit polls, and it is subject to swings more than three times as large.The next couple of paragraphs pretty much sum it up:
Based on the turnout in 2004, Bush's margin over Kerry dropped by 4.8 million votes among libertarians. Had he held his libertarian supporters, he would have won a smashing reelection rather than squeaking by in Ohio.The fact is that the Republican Party is no longer a home for libertarian voters. The question is which party is going to take the steps necessary to sway these voters. If the Republicans continue the course that they've been on in the past few years, and by their leadership election results it seems that they still haven't learned their lesson, I think you'll see the 24% gap grow to 30% or 40% in the next two elections.President Bush and the congressional Republicans left no libertarian button unpushed in the past six years: soaring spending, expansion of entitlements, federalization of education, cracking down on state medical marijuana initiatives, Sarbanes-Oxley, gay marriage bans, stem cell research restrictions, wiretapping, incarcerating U.S. citizens without a lawyer, unprecedented executive powers, and of course an unnecessary and apparently futile war. The striking thing may be that after all that, Democrats still looked worse to a majority of libertarians.
Because libertarians tend to be younger and better educated than the average voter, they're not going away. They're an appealing target for Democrats, but they are essential to future Republican successes. Republicans can win the South without libertarians. But this was the year that New Hampshire and the Mountain West turned purple if not blue, and libertarians played a big role there. New Hampshire may be the most libertarian state in the country; this year both the state's Republican congressmen lost.
Will the Democrats reach out to libertarian voters? It remains to be seen. I don't think they will. They've embraced the left and the myth of FDR, that it is government that makes this a great country. I think it is a possibility in some parts of the country. Georgia is a place that some free-market Democrats are opening up to libertarian ideals.
Ultimately the only home for these individuals is the Libertarian Party.
Hat tip to Doug @ the Liberty Papers.
Comments
I would like to see neither party sway Libertarian voters. I would like to see the LP organize, raise funds, and run candidates who can win or gain a respectable share of the vote.
Posted by: Joshua Pateson | December 9, 2006 11:34 AM
Josh,
I agree. A lot what these guy view as libertarian voters vote for the two major parties out of pragmatism.
Posted by: Jason | December 9, 2006 11:43 AM
So when are you running? I read this interview with Badnarik for the first time yesterday: http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2004/tle265-20040404-02.html.
Now I wonder if we aren't all obligated...
Posted by: Petty | December 9, 2006 11:46 AM
Possibly School Board, District 2. Remember my name. :-)
Posted by: Joshua Pateson | December 9, 2006 02:28 PM
I think if some of the, what I consider to be "quirks", were down played or eliminated from your party's platform---You'd have a great chance at converting many disenchanted conservatives.
Posted by: Tyler | December 12, 2006 04:13 PM